Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District

From ResearchID.org

The Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District was the first trial addressing the Constitutionality of intelligent design. Despite testimony by scientists Michael Behe and Scott Minnich, as well as philosopher Steve Fuller that intelligent design was legitimate science, and despite a brief asking the court not to rule on whether ID was science, Judge John E. Jones ruled in favor of the plaintiffs that intelligent design was religious in nature. This decision has been extensively criticized by both the Discovery Institute and various legal commentators.

Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District: Wikipedia

1 Trial Documents
2 Briefs not entered
3 Reviews: Pro ID
- 3.1 Foundation for Thought and Ethics
4 Reviews: Anti ID
5 Reviews: Other
6 References
7 External Links
8 Field(s) (?)

[edit]

Trial Documents

[edit]

Briefs not entered

William A. Dembski, Expert Witness Report: The Scientific Status of Intelligent Design, March 29, 2005, The DesignInference.com
William A. Dembski, Rebuttal to Reports by Opposing Expert Witnesses, May 14, 2005

[edit]

Reviews: Pro ID

David K. DeWolf, John G. West, Casey Luskin, & Jonathan Witt, Traipsing Into Evolution: Intelligent Design and the Kitzmiller vs. Dover Decision, Discovery Institute Press, 2006 ISBN: 0963865498

John G. West, Dover In Review, Discovery Institute, January 6, 2006

From Jefferson to Jones: Self-Evident Truths Made Illegal Roddy Bullock, Intelligent Design Network of Ohio. 12/01/06 The ID Report, ARN.org

West and DeWolf (2006) found that Jones drew 90.9% of his section on ID as science from the ACLU’s proposed “Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law” including its errors. ^[1]

IntellectualConservative.com IntellectualConservative.com Reviews of Traipsing Into Evolution June 29, 2006
The Potential Constitutionality of Intelligent Design? Stephanie L. Shemin∗ Geo. Mason L. Rev., Vol. 13:3, 621-695, (2005)
Kitzmiller v. Dover: The Truth behind the Politics Samuel S. Chen, 2006, 50 pp
Intelligent Design Will Survive Kitzmiller v. Dover David K. DeWolf, John G. West, Casey Luskin, 68 Montana Law Review pp 7-57, (2007)

David K. DeWolf, John G. West & Casey Luskin, Rebuttal to Irons, 68 Montana Law Review 89 (2007).

[edit]

Foundation for Thought and Ethics

Seth L. Cooper & Leonard G. Brown III, A Textbook Case of Judicial Activism, Discovery Website, August 22, 2006

[edit]

Reviews: Anti ID

Does Changing the Definition of Science Solve the Establishment Clause Problem for Teaching Intelligent Design as Science in Public Schools? Doing an End-Run Around the Constitution, Anne Marie Lofaso, 4 Pierce L. Rev. 219 -277 (2006)(revised)

Divided by Design: Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, Intelligent Design, and Civic Education, Kevin Trowel, Georgetown Law Journal V.95-3, pp 856-894 (2006)

Seeing Government Purpose through Objective Viewers Eyes: The Evolution Intelligent Design Debates, Kristi L. Bowman, Harvard J. Law & Public Policy, V. 29 No. 2 pp 417-490 (2006)

Peter Irons Disaster in Dover: The Trials (and Tribulations) of Intelligent Design 68 Montana Law Review pp 59-87 (2007)

[edit]

Reviews: Other

Editors' Note: Intelligent Design Articles 68 Montanna Law Review pp 1-5, (2007)
Anti-social Epistemologies, Gary Edmond and David Mercer Social Studies of Science 2006; 36; 843
A More Sensible Solution to Religious Bias in Science Larry Caldwell on July 4, 2007
Constitutional Law - Establishment Clause - Middle District of Pennsylvania holds that the teaching of Intelligent Design violates the Establishment Clause - Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 400 F. Supp. 2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005). 119 Harvard Law Review, 2268 - 2275 (2006)

[edit]