General ID Debate

(All of the choices offered on the frontpage poll take you to this same page)

Speak your mind! Make an entry for this informal poll by putting your signature under your stance.

Click on the 'Create an account or log in' link at the top right of the page to edit this page.

Click on the 'discussion' tab at the top left of the page in order to talk with other visitors about this topic.

I support ID

--idadvisors
--JosephCCampana
--User:Glenn Jennings 2/23/2006 15:09 CDT
--SierraEcho 23:47, 23 February 2006 (CST)
--User:Joe G Joe Gallien (http://intelligentreasoning.blogspot.com)
--Laurence Murray
--Atom tha Immortal (http://www.myspace.com/atomthaimmortal)
--EJ Klone 23:12, 26 June 2006 (CDT)
--User:Grant Rost The philosophy of naturalism/materialism, which holds that there is nothing beyond nature or beyond mere matter, and which is a foundational presupposition of the "science" of evolution, is itself untestable and cannot be proven by the scientific method. To say one must only postulate a natural cause about our origin is to make an omniscient, and thus a foolish claim.

And I promise to spend as much spare time as I can keeping this wiki fact-based and empirically supportable: i.e., anti-ID. Ramanpotential 22:44, 22 March 2006 (CST)
--Glip 03:24, 26 March 2006 (CST)
...or at least I think it's unscientific, unmathematical and inaccurate. This wiki seems to be attempting to behave in a scientific fashion, though, and I think that's worth encouraging. -- Corkscrew